Ten years later, the September 11, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, and the United
Airlines Flight 93 crash in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, still cloud over the
American imagination. The resonant images—the exhaust-black sky over the
cindering, collapsing Twin Towers, or the plume of flame jetting from the
Pentagon’s side, or the ash pit in Shanksville where the plane crashed—have
metamorphosed into cultural touchstones, vividly re-evoking the tragedies. Pundits
and politicians have analyzed and capitalized on the attacks, while America’s
fiction writers, essayists, and poets have shouldered the Atlas-like task of
re-witnessing these events and guiding us, as readers and human beings, through
the devastation.
The news media instilled an
unsettling reality—a sense of helpless paralysis—in those distanced from the
sites. CNN, and other news agencies streamed the footage of the Towers disintegrating
on a disturbing loop; newspapers were hardly better, centering the destruction
of the iconic Towers on their front pages. In Elizabeth Strout’s
novel-in-stories, Olive Kitteridge
(2008), the eponymous character prepares to visit her son in New York and
trembles from the psychological shock of observing—from a safe distance in
Portland, Maine—the devastation:
. . . back when those planes ripped through the towers, Olive had sat in her bedroom and wept like a baby, not so much for this country but for the city itself, which had seemed to her to become suddenly no longer a foreign, hardened place, but as fragile as a class of kindergarten children, brave in their terror.
Strout’s effortless glide into Olive’s subconscious
demonstrates a key intent of 9/11 writing as a genre: 9/11 narratives do not
re-create the tragedy but process its vast scope into something that shapes a
community of similarly spirited readers. Olive, a former teacher, likens New
York’s inhabitants to kindergarten students valiantly grappling with something
beyond their understandings. This pings a rare dent of sentiment into Strout’s
ornery protagonist, and 9/11 transforms into a metaphor for how Olive might
repair her relationship with her son.
Re-building families from the
ground up recurs throughout 9/11 narratives, including novels such as Jonathan
Franzen’s Freedom (2010), Porochista
Khakpour’s Sons and Other Flammable Objects (2007), and Don DeLillo’s Falling Man (2007). A portion of DeLillo’s novel was published
as a short story entitled “Still-Life” in the April 9, 2007, edition of The New Yorker; the excerpt tracks Keith and
Lianne, an estranged couple, as they resume their domestic routine after Keith
narrowly escapes the carnage at Ground Zero. We learn, as Keith rekindles a
relationship with his and Lianne’s son Justin, that the collapse has founded in
Keith a desire to better understand his world, even as terrible possibilities
lurk in the unknown:
Keith as well was going slow, easing inward. He used to want to fly out of self-awareness, day and night, a body in raw motion. Now he finds himself drifting into spells of reflection . . . drawing things out of time and memory into some dim space that bears his collected experience. . . . Something is always happening, even on the quietest days and deep into the night, if you stand awhile and look.
DeLillo reminds us, though, that this vigilance is meant to
counteract paranoia, to re-forge those ties that matter most. Notably, the
section of “Still-Life” containing the above quotation concludes with Justin
snapping Keith from his reverie with the statement, “We go home now.”
9/11 narratives shift readers from
cataclysm to fostering communities by propelling us from terrified stasis into
tentative yet meaningful activity. This often occurs through fragmented
narratives moving between multiple points of view. Strout displaces Olive’s
reaction by placing her trip to New York after the attacks, and DeLillo’s work
exhibits these tendencies as the novel reacts to 9/11 in the following days. Perhaps
one of the most splintered 9/11 stories, Deborah Eisenberg’s “Twilight of the
Superheroes” ping-pongs between a post-9/11 New York, the pointless paranoia of
Y2K, and an array of homes and art galleries. This frequently reminds the
reader of art’s import in coping with any suffering. Eisenberg’s story
generates momentum, urging her characters forward and reminding her readers in
the concluding clause—“and then the children turned the page”—that better
futures await the next generation.
9/11 writings—a genre too broad to
fully describe in this brief piece—do not commemorate disaster, but memorialize
how to persevere. If the genre possesses a shortcoming, it is that the lessons
of 9/11 fiction extend beyond New York’s city limits. (I write this as a
long-time resident of central Pennsylvania, one who was astutely aware of how
the crash in Shanksville transformed the region overnight.) Regardless, no
guides were better suited to the task of re-imagining America than our favorite
stories of the past decade. Fiction, particularly in catastrophe’s wake, brings
us together as thinking and emoting human beings in a way that nothing else
does.